Search for: "John Doe 1-10, Nos. 1-50"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
Papa John’s). [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
No. 16-1 at 50.) [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Shinseki, No. 1:10–cv–1124, 2012 WL 381589, at *2 n.1 (W.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:44 am
By John M. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am
Its post-Bose fraud decisions in Enbridge and Asian and Western (Nos. 40 and 42) and its finding of a lack of bona fide intent on the part of the Section 44(e) applicant in Honda v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:04 am
Handwriting expert John McCrae compared specimen signatures and was 99.99 per cent sure that those on the will were not genuine. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
John Docherty and Charles Kovats, Assistant United States Attorneys and William M. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
As one House Committee Report stated, exempt offerings should be “a specific or an isolated sale of…securities to a particular person”[10] and were intended for limited transactions “where the public benefits are too remote. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
Although death sentences since 1980 have increased in number to about 250 per year,(1) this is still only 1 per cent of all homicides known to the police.(2) Of all those convicted on a charge of criminal homicide, only 2 percent -- about 1 in 50 -- are eventually sentenced to death.(3)The possibility of increasing the number of convicted murderers sentenced to death and executed by enacting mandatory death penalty laws was ruled unconstitutional in 1976 (Woodson… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
See Orders at docket nos. 197, 223, 225, 251, 256 and 258. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
”[23] Importantly, the Investor Advocate has urged all exchanges that list SPACs to implement a conversion threshold of at least 50 [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Justice O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This case requires us to consider to what extent the “fair use” provision of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, (hereinafter the Copyright Act) 17 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Nov. 29, 2010) (No. 10-290) ("[I]t is not the district court's role under Daubert to evaluate the correctness of facts underlying an expert's testimony. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Financial Aspects of Intellectual Property) IP finance seminar on patent and copyright term: ‘IP Term: What it Means in Finance Terms’ presentation (IP finance) The difference between invention and innovation in the netbook space (Techdirt) WIPO launches strategic change program (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Kenya) Draft programme of WIPO funder meeting for development (Intellectual Property Watch) Confidential document from WIPO details strategy on IP, climate change… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Federal law does not allow campaign money to be spent improving politicians’ personal lives. [read post]
